What DO YOU THINK?!?! Help Others, Help Yourself!
Rules of the game: Provided your peers with feedback.
-You must review TWO websites in every Grade Level =SIX websites Per Person!
-You must answer the following questions FOR EVERY WEBSITE & STATE YOUR EVIDENCE!
-What does state your evidence mean?!?! State your evidence means you must give a detailed explanation for why you think what you think. You may NOT only say, “They did a good job!” or “It was horrible!” You must back up your thoughts with evidence about WHY they did a good job.
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
S.R.
ReplyDelete6 grade
M.F. and E.P.
The quality of the math was good, it was not the worst but I think they could have done better. It was easy to understand but it was too easy. They could have done harder problems and done it with better quality. The graphics were good some of the time the color of the back round made it hard to see the words. But over all the colors real grab your attention. Suggestions would be to make it a little harder and maybe not so colorful. The best part of the web site was the sketch fu. The part of the site that need work was the back round color and the color of the words.
Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
6th grade Elie B. and Rhodri T.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Quality of math was good and somewhat easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
graphics were very good and wanted me to do little math, then set it down
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
edit your website and explain how you use integers to balance checkbook. The best part was the interesting pictures.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They tried to follow the rule brick but only succeed in some areas. Best thing was making it good to look and needed to improve on six traits
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Low B because helped you learn the subject but did it in a rushed way.
JR
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
CB and CS Grade 6
What do you think of the content?
The quality of the math was very accuarate.
It was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
The graphics were funny but the backrounds made it hard to see the words.
It made me want to go try their stragedy out.
What suggestions do you have?
Make the words readable.
The best part was the graphics they were funny.
The quiz also was confusing so work on that.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric.
The explanation of the stragedy.
They need to improve onwriting part.
What grade would you give you site?
A because it was to the point.
M.H.
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• A.M. and H.W.
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was pretty good.
• The math was very easy to understand, and the abbreviations helped.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were fine, but nothing fancy or interesting.
• While reading it, it made me want to try the equations.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest that next time add more pizzazz or fancy stuff.
• The best part of the powerpoint were the practice problems. Short and sweet.
• I don't think anything needed any improvement.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric, but left out the State Standard.
• The section that they did best on was the practice problems.
• There was no section that needed improvement.
What grade would you give you site?
• A- because it was almost perfect except the State Standard was missing.
Who are you talking about?
ReplyDeleteJimmy M. and Joscia S. grade 6
what do you think of the content?
The quality of the math sounds a little childish. It was easy to understand, but could have been a little more mathematical.
Did it grab your attention?
I think the graphics used took attention away from the math; they didn’t really have anything to do with the information that was being given. It was just random things on each page. It did not want me to try the math.
What suggestions do you have?
I would suggest that they use graphics that describe and fit the math better and they should use more mathematical language. The probably could make that math a little more challenging instead of repeating the same number on every part of the square. My favorite part of the sit was the test questions. The vocabulary really needs improvement.
What about the rubric?
They followed some of the rubric and got most sections in their sit. Even though they followed the rubric, they didn’t do a great job of following it.
They did best on the practice problems because the problems are a good practice to start finding the volume.
The whole sit could use improvement in just about every area.
What grade would you give you site?
I would give the sit a C because it needs a lot of improvement.
Graded by JV. grade 7
M.H.
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• A.M. and H.W.
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was pretty good.
• The math was very easy to understand, and the abbreviations helped.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were fine, but nothing fancy or interesting.
• While reading it, it made me want to try the equations.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest that next time add more pzazz or fancy stuff.
• The best part of the powerpoint were the practice problems. Short and sweet.
• I don't think anything needed any improvement.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric, but left out the State Standard.
• The section that they did best on was the practice problems.
• There was no section that needed improvement.
What grade would you give you site?
• A- because it was almost perfect except the State Standard was missing.
H.H. Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
A. M. and H. W. 6th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
The math was correct and it was simple to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
There was a little bit of graphics but not very exciting, and it made me want to do some of the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I suggest the make it more colorful. The best part was how they broke it apart. They needed a little more graphics.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They followed the rubric. They did best on their math. They needed to improve a little on their bibliography.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give it an A because it had good quality but it just wasn’t that colorful which isn’t a big importance.
H.H. correct versions Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
B. T. and E. W. 6th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
The math was good and correct. It was easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
I like how the graphics were colorful. It made me want to do the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I suggest to use normal letters and numbers because it was a little hard to read. The best part of the P.P. was it was colorful. I think they needed to improve on the all the graphics.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They followed the rubric. They did best on assessments.
They need to improve on shortening their PowerPoint.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give it an A because it had a lot of information.
M.H.
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• P.M. and N.H. 7th Grade
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was okay, but got boring.
• It got hard to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics could have been better.
• It made me want to do the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest to not have most of the slides be practice problems.
• The best part of the PowerPoint was the vocab.
• The State Standard was not included.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric, but left out the State Standard.
• The best section was the vocab.
• The section that needed improvement were the practice problems.
What grade would you give you site?
• B+. It could have more.
E.D.
ReplyDeleteNick and Paul, 7th grade honors
Good math, though they did not explain it enough for complete understanding. It was a little hard on the eyes; they should go back and redo the visual. They followed the rubric, though they could have made it more interesting.
Breslin and Sage, 7th grade honors
These two did an OUTSTANDING job on their project. They seemed to follow the rubric completely, the math was easy to follow and understand, and you could tell they were completely sure of what they were talking about. The powerpoint was interesting to look at, and easy to follow the entire way. Good job!
Makena and Emma, 6th grade
Good information, though not enough time spent explaining things. They followed the rubric well, and included everything they needed to, though were skimpy on some parts. Hard to understand directions on the test and assessment.
Alex and Hank, 6th grade
Good job, boys! Nice backgrounds, easy to read, the information was thorough and well thought out. Not too much graphics, not too little.
Alonzo and Justin, 8th grade
I love the pictures you guys included in your power point. They really help the viewer understand what you're talking about. Your information was good, too, and you followed the rubric pretty well. However, you seemed to leave out a bibliography and vocabulary.
Ashley and Sina, 8th grade
Good visually, but blurry and hard to read on some slides. Some slides cannot be viewed, and seem to be unfinished. The information, though, is accurate and easy to follow. In all, well done.
AJ and CD, 8th grade honors
A good site visually and informationally. Seemed to lack a bibliography. It was hard to understand what to do in the practice problems. A little more explanation could be used there.
Alper and Cristian, 8th grade honors
Very captivating. It is easy to follow, however, I did not fully understand what you were trying to explain. A little more time on explanation of the topic. The practice problems were good, and when viewing the answers, you could easily see what you did wrong, if anything. Good graphics and good following the rubric.
Mazeltov on all your hard work!
S.S
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
A.B. & L.R. 7th grade
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
Wow, amazing job you guys (: All the math seemed correct and well thought about.
• Was it easy to understand?
It was very easy to understand and I would love to learn more. Made me interested (:
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
The graphics were perfect and edgy. Wanted to me to look even more!
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
It made me want to sit down and look into the website ever more so that the concept was easy and clear to me.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
This was a phenomenal website and I don’t think there was anything bad. Just watch and make sure you double check on things like spelling, and make sure you can see the text well and clear.
• What was the best part of the site?
The best part of the site would be all the links and creativity/time put into the website.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Maybe the explaining portion?
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
All of the expectations were there and it had everything that was asked for(:
• What section did they do the best on?
They did the best on the creativity and test/quizzes
• What section did they need to improve on?
May improve on the explaining
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give them an A, because it was like PERFECT! Everything that was expected was there (: Wonderful job you guys !
Who are you talking about?
ReplyDeleteNH and PM Grade 7
What do you think of the content?
It could be better.
It was easy to understand though.
Did it grab your attention?
Really bad graphics.
It kind of made me want to try out.
What suggestions do you have?
Make it more informational.
The test was good.
There needs to be more info.
What about the rubric?
They followed the rubric
What grade would you give you site?
S.A Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
6th grade Elie B. and Rhodri T.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Quality of math was good and somewhat easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
graphics were very good and wanted me to do little math, then set it down
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
edit your website and explain how you use integers to balance checkbook. The best part was the interesting pictures.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
They tried to follow the rule brick but only succeed in some areas. Best thing was making it good to look and needed to improve on six traits
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Low B because helped you learn the subject but did it in a rushed way.
Who are you talking about?
ReplyDelete• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Aris S. and Sara A. grade 8
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
The quality of the math is very good.
• Was it easy to understand?
It is easy to understand, but is at a good challenge level for the project.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
I thought the graphics fit the project well, and related to the subject without causing a distraction.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
It made me willing to try the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I might suggest that they authors put more graphics on there power point.
• What was the best part of the site?
My favorite part was the way the PowerPoint was organized and the colors they choose.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The improvement should be a little more information on each page.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes, they followed the rubric, I didn’t notice anything missing.
• What section did they do the best on?
They did the best on the practice and test problems and answers.
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would give this project an A because it well done and is very nice.
Graded by JV grade 7
S.A Questions:
ReplyDeleteWho are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Breslin S. and S. D.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
The representations were good and kind of easy to understand
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
The graphics were decent and the math looked somewhat boring
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
make it more fun
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
yes very much so
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Low A it was good but not perfect